I've debated in my own head the worth and value of keeping my pet insurance for years now.
The facts... my 11 year old yellow lab with the exception of a few minor bumps and scrapes has thankfully lived an incident free life.
Yet for years, I have, through guilt or whatever other rationale, have been paying monthly premiums for pet insurance to the tune of approximately $60 per month ~ $58.14 to be exact. And I just got a notice that they would be increasing my rates once my dog turns 12 in March. Think about that for a second. That's almost $700 a year on insurance that may or may not get used.
On a normal year, I take my dog to the vet once a year for his annual visit to update his vaccinations (if needed, older dogs only need new shots every 3 years), and go through his routine veterinary exams. How much do these routine visits cost? Depending on what battery of tests my vet convinces me to opt-in to, anywhere from $200 - $300 per visit. So where's the logic in that? I spent $700 on insurance and how much do I get reimbursed? After fees, deductibles and x% co-insurance, about $120 - $190.
Last year, my dog actually had an incident and had a benign growth removed from his leg. In total, that cost me about $1,000. How much did insurance cover? about $530. so what gives?
I have never broken even on my insurance costs. Granted, my premiums included additional cancer coverage and thankfully my dog has not gotten cancer, but i'm starting to doubt whether I will ever be paid any more benefit than the premiums I have already spent.
So why do I do it? Why don't I just cancel the coverage and save the money? Because I have to. As sure as Murphy's law will intervene, the second I cancel coverage, I know I will find something bad growing on my dog.
So for now, the pet insurance companies still win, and suckers like me still pay.
What does everyone else think?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment